Which type of analysis is described as systematic and focused on incident causes?

Root Cause Analysis is recognized for its systematic approach to identifying the primary causes of incidents rather than just addressing the superficial symptoms. This type of analysis delves deep into the various factors that contribute to an issue, allowing organizations to understand not only what happened but why it happened. By pinpointing these underlying causes, Root Cause Analysis helps in developing effective solutions that can prevent recurrence, leading to improved safety, operational efficiency, and risk management.

This method is particularly valuable in risk management as it focuses on understanding the intricacies of an incident, often using tools and techniques such as the "5 Whys" or fishbone diagrams. Such a rigorous examination ensures that the solutions implemented are not only appropriate but also sustainable in the long term.

In contrast, other options like Risk Register analysis and Heat Mapping are tools used for tracking risks and visualizing their impact, yet they do not inherently focus on the causative factors of incidents. Similarly, qualitative analysis involves subjective assessments but may not delve deeply into the cause-and-effect relationships that Root Cause Analysis specifically aims to clarify. Therefore, the distinct emphasis of Root Cause Analysis on incidents' origins makes it the correct choice in this context.